P6FourSeason tyre reviews


    We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
    and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.


    P6FourSeason tyre review

    Grip in dry conditions

    Braking in dry conditions

    Grip in wet conditions

    Braking in wet conditions

    Grip in snow

    Driving comfort

    Internal noise level

    Tyre wear

    Fuel consumption

    Average based on 12 test results
    Ø 4,885,488 km driven


    12.09.2009 from  Note  3.12
    (15,000 km driven)
    • Grip in dry conditions
    • Braking in dry conditions
    • Grip in wet conditions
    • Braking in wet conditions
    • Grip in snow
    • Driving comfort
    • Internal noise level
    • Tyre wear
    • Fuel consumption  N/A
    Tyre size and vehicle make
    205 / 55 R15 V
    BMW 320
    Result: Would you buy again? Probably
    Comment:
    the P6 are mounted on the front, and i have michelin summer tyre on the rear wheel. the P6 is better than the michelin on wet condition, but worst under dry et hot condition. it's a good tyre for winter or rain.I have dont test the P6 under snow condition.

    09.07.2009 from  Note  4.18
    (64,000 km driven)
    • Grip in dry conditions
    • Braking in dry conditions
    • Grip in wet conditions
    • Braking in wet conditions
    • Grip in snow
    • Driving comfort
    • Internal noise level
    • Tyre wear
    • Fuel consumption  N/A
    Tyre size and vehicle make
    235 / 40 R18 V
    2007 VW Passat
    Result: Would you buy again? Probably
    Comment:
    Good Tire all around. Wears ok but noisy as tread wears down

    13.02.2006 from  Garbo Tezel Note  3.15
    (60,000 km driven)
    • Grip in dry conditions
    • Braking in dry conditions
    • Grip in wet conditions
    • Braking in wet conditions
    • Grip in snow
    • Driving comfort
    • Internal noise level
    • Tyre wear
    • Fuel consumption  N/A
    Tyre size and vehicle make
    195 / 60 R15 H
    Volvo S40 1.6
    Result: Would you buy again? Probably not
    Comment:
    In first 30.000km's, the tires were superb. But in the 2nd 30.000km's, the quality went bad dramatically. BTW, i can use the rear tires 5000km.s more. But i should have changed the front tires 10.000km.s before!

    26.01.2004 from  Note  2.08
    (60,000 km driven)
    • Grip in dry conditions
    • Braking in dry conditions
    • Grip in wet conditions
    • Braking in wet conditions
    • Grip in snow
    • Driving comfort
    • Internal noise level
    • Tyre wear
    • Fuel consumption  N/A
    Tyre size and vehicle make
    215 / 45 R17 ZR
    Saab 93 Aero
    Result: Would you buy again? No way
    Comment:
    Fitted as standard on the car when new, it was not until I put a pair of Hankook Ventus 102 on the front that I really appreciated how these tyres struggled. Poor grip and poor wear coupled with greater road noise make these tyres a poor choice. Steer cle

    We use cookies to personalize content and ads, provide social media features, and analyze traffic. In addition, we provide social media, advertising, and analytics partners with information about how you use our website. If you continue to use our website, you agree to our cookies.